5 concepts that cry for disposal of public schools | From the Source
Home bookstore Word Master Virtual Goetheanum magazine terjemahan "Grain of Wheat" newspaper "anthropic. News "" The Road to the Sun "Other books Spiritual Beinsa Duno Rudolf Steiner Nikolai Raynov Prophecies Modern Apocrypha secular dictatorships banksters Farmafiya Food & GMO militarism Ekofashizam Education Technology and Mass Media Censorship here and there Podcasts Coming of Ahriman Various sermons Past History Archaeology Multimedia
Authors Owner Peter Asen Chilingirov Tihomir Ivanov Vladimir Kayryamov Malchanova Svetlan Bonev Horinski Nelly Stanislav T. Dimitar Mangurov Annual Archives 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Labels Book of donors "From the Source" Discussion Forum
As a parent who is a supporter of homeschooling often think about the children who are still in the public education system. While we strongly believe in the benefits of what our children are at home and lead a life in terms of home schooling, terjemahan I know that this is simply not possible for everyone.
I think the public education system uses completely ineffective models for teaching and learning. Our school system is deeply rooted in an archaic mental template that should be reviewed and improved terjemahan to keep pace with current technological and societal progress.
While poshtryavame happiness, confidence, security and courage children to seek their calling, it's time to see and what we need to remove from the philosophy of the education system so that we can better prepare their children for the real world that awaits them outside organized theaters in the schoolyard.
Division by age students only fueled the idea that we can not work together with different people. This might not be farther from the truth. Working with different age groups is not only useful for the development of children, terjemahan but takes into account the diverse pace with which they develop. Not all five years of the same level. Why not offer them the opportunity to learn from older children or helping the less?
A broad range of age groups in the classroom will make a few things. For starters, it seems that young children benefit greatly from the older students, as love to emulate sisters, brothers and their fellows. Older gain confidence and joy while helping others, and learn to be more tolerant and considerate of others when caring for the younger ones. This improves and all can be achieved quite easily.
Rehabilitation programs (for adults) are great and work well. But why not offer this type of interaction in schools? terjemahan Determine the age difference of 3-4 years, at least for certain classes and activities. Simulation scenarios in practice and see what works best for students. Schools a "Montessori" terjemahan already do and this helps to promote self-confidence and creativity. Two things that currently are heavily zanimareni in our school system.
"When the results of the tests increased need to worry - because they are a bad measure the things that really matter, they do not take into account all that sacrifice in a desperate attempt to increase performance." - Alfie Kohn, a prominent psychologist with many books on education at home and in school.
Test methods for children through tests is justified by the ability to control the learning process. How will we know what our children terjemahan if teachers terjemahan do their job without tests - advocates say the tests. This form of "report" should, however, terjemahan take into account the happiness of children and parents. There will always be unhappy, but if the overwhelming sentiment is positive and the children experience the joy of learning, it will be enough. Again, if we parents have control, terjemahan we can simply give them a choice: to choose for their children schools, which emphasizes the test or one that does not.
The common application of the tests is not exactly measure the capabilities of the students. Literacy and skills can not be measured by any universal patterns. In addition, more teachers complain that they lose any freedom that previously had on how to teach in the classroom before terjemahan the exam. The quality and flexibility of education falls, because the focus is entirely on what the creators terjemahan of the tests are important.
Meanwhile, creativity and individual talents of the individual terjemahan student terjemahan suppress terjemahan or deleted from his life. Finally let's not forget that every answer to the questions of the so-called terjemahan tests can be found in seconds terjemahan with your phone or computer. So, really, what's the point?
Many home and require children to attend school for long hours overwhelm children with tedious work. Rest
Home bookstore Word Master Virtual Goetheanum magazine terjemahan "Grain of Wheat" newspaper "anthropic. News "" The Road to the Sun "Other books Spiritual Beinsa Duno Rudolf Steiner Nikolai Raynov Prophecies Modern Apocrypha secular dictatorships banksters Farmafiya Food & GMO militarism Ekofashizam Education Technology and Mass Media Censorship here and there Podcasts Coming of Ahriman Various sermons Past History Archaeology Multimedia
Authors Owner Peter Asen Chilingirov Tihomir Ivanov Vladimir Kayryamov Malchanova Svetlan Bonev Horinski Nelly Stanislav T. Dimitar Mangurov Annual Archives 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Labels Book of donors "From the Source" Discussion Forum
As a parent who is a supporter of homeschooling often think about the children who are still in the public education system. While we strongly believe in the benefits of what our children are at home and lead a life in terms of home schooling, terjemahan I know that this is simply not possible for everyone.
I think the public education system uses completely ineffective models for teaching and learning. Our school system is deeply rooted in an archaic mental template that should be reviewed and improved terjemahan to keep pace with current technological and societal progress.
While poshtryavame happiness, confidence, security and courage children to seek their calling, it's time to see and what we need to remove from the philosophy of the education system so that we can better prepare their children for the real world that awaits them outside organized theaters in the schoolyard.
Division by age students only fueled the idea that we can not work together with different people. This might not be farther from the truth. Working with different age groups is not only useful for the development of children, terjemahan but takes into account the diverse pace with which they develop. Not all five years of the same level. Why not offer them the opportunity to learn from older children or helping the less?
A broad range of age groups in the classroom will make a few things. For starters, it seems that young children benefit greatly from the older students, as love to emulate sisters, brothers and their fellows. Older gain confidence and joy while helping others, and learn to be more tolerant and considerate of others when caring for the younger ones. This improves and all can be achieved quite easily.
Rehabilitation programs (for adults) are great and work well. But why not offer this type of interaction in schools? terjemahan Determine the age difference of 3-4 years, at least for certain classes and activities. Simulation scenarios in practice and see what works best for students. Schools a "Montessori" terjemahan already do and this helps to promote self-confidence and creativity. Two things that currently are heavily zanimareni in our school system.
"When the results of the tests increased need to worry - because they are a bad measure the things that really matter, they do not take into account all that sacrifice in a desperate attempt to increase performance." - Alfie Kohn, a prominent psychologist with many books on education at home and in school.
Test methods for children through tests is justified by the ability to control the learning process. How will we know what our children terjemahan if teachers terjemahan do their job without tests - advocates say the tests. This form of "report" should, however, terjemahan take into account the happiness of children and parents. There will always be unhappy, but if the overwhelming sentiment is positive and the children experience the joy of learning, it will be enough. Again, if we parents have control, terjemahan we can simply give them a choice: to choose for their children schools, which emphasizes the test or one that does not.
The common application of the tests is not exactly measure the capabilities of the students. Literacy and skills can not be measured by any universal patterns. In addition, more teachers complain that they lose any freedom that previously had on how to teach in the classroom before terjemahan the exam. The quality and flexibility of education falls, because the focus is entirely on what the creators terjemahan of the tests are important.
Meanwhile, creativity and individual talents of the individual terjemahan student terjemahan suppress terjemahan or deleted from his life. Finally let's not forget that every answer to the questions of the so-called terjemahan tests can be found in seconds terjemahan with your phone or computer. So, really, what's the point?
Many home and require children to attend school for long hours overwhelm children with tedious work. Rest
No comments:
Post a Comment